Tag: DivergentThinking

  • Not leaving good ideas to chance

    If we are trying to make the world better, then we need a creative strategy. Design involves two modes of thought: divergent and convergent. The divergent part helps us figure out what might be possible. The convergent part turns that possibility into a plan for action.

    A bad idea well executed is still a bad idea. We need creative thinking in the divergent mode to generate new possibilities, so we can choose the best available idea in the circumstances. 

    Some ideas do come about by accident, but leaving the groundbreaking thinking to chance is not a plan for success. 

    If we don’t have a creative strategy for solving a client’s design brief, then we might lose a client. But if the problem we are trying to solve is much bigger, like how do we bend the construction industry into being an ecological force for good, then we have much more to lose if we don’t have a creative strategy. 

    Yesterday’s riff on beer brewing gives us some clues about what that strategy might involve: 

    • We need to understand the existing system.
      We need to connect to patterns of the past. Ways of doing things that have worked before. 
    • We need to connect to patterns of the future. As the expression goes, the future is not evenly distributed. If we look, we can find examples of the future already in the present.
    • We need to learn from patterns that work – for example, understanding how living systems thrive within their ecosystem limits. 

    Above all, we need to give structure to this creative work. Because if we don’t design our creative process, then we leave change to chance. 

  • Beginning the journey to better ideas

    I hope that in my recent posts I’ve made the case for the need for divergent thinking in our work as engineers (and other humans). If you’d like a recap, here’s some recent posts on this topic.

    I say all this because, in the coming weeks on this blog, I’m going to be delving into strategies for having better ideas, both for ourselves and also in the teams we lead. These tools come under the broad heading of How to Have Better Ideas. 

    To get ready, I’d like you to go to the Settings Page on your brain and navigate to Thinking>Modes, find the settings for the following: prioritisation; risk-aversity; simplification; validation; tidiness; disambiguation and doubt – and toggle these to off. We’re now ready to start our journey into the land of divergent thinking.

  • The trap of the same way as before

    It is easy to do something the same way we did it before. 

    The previous time acts as a guide.

    Using the same approach as last time gives us something to improve on. We can see the shortcomings and improve on them. 

    We need to do less mental work when we use a tried and tested and optimised approach.

    Using the same way as before avoids us challenging whether the way we’ve been doing things for all these iterations is still fit-for-purpose.

    The same way as before gets us out of difficult negotiations with the other people who are also invested in the same-way-as-before approach.

    And it avoids us having to do the hard work of imagining and creating something different.  Something better. Something more appropriate. Something that the system we are working in needs more than the same way as before.

  • Divergent poem

    Two days ago we had the Convergent Poem, full of ways of working that engineers (and other humans) tend to get praise for. Here is its awkward sibling, the Divergent Poem. Full of the things that aren’t necessarily valued by the professional system we are in, but are no less important, and could be more important.

    Shake it up,

    Tear it down,

    Breathe it in,

    Break it out,

    Multiply,

    Ask, what if I,

    Take random paths,

    And photographs,

    Pin up, collate,

    Re-conbobulate,

    Find time to explore,

    And imagine more.

    Choose the right poem for the job. Because, there’s no point in aiming for the summit if we are climbing the wrong hill.