Tag: SubjectiveVersusObjective

  • Standardising decision-making in design

    Standardising decision-making enables companies to save money. A standardised process allows more junior staff to make decisions without needing to consult a more senior member of staff. Why might a more senior member of staff be required? Because subjective decisions require experience, perspective, and judgement, all of which take time to develop. It is therefore natural for a company seeking to increase profitability to look towards standardising its decision-making processes.

    However, we can also recognise the limitations of this approach. We encounter them when the service provider we rely on can’t make an exception in our case because their system won’t permit it, even though all that’s required is for someone to use judgement and say, ‘this is acceptable.’

    Our aim in construction should be to build far less that is new and to work much more with what already exists. Building new structures lends itself well to standardised processes. Working with existing structures is a much subtler art, requiring observation, analysis, and careful decision-making. Standardised decision-making will become significantly harder, and there will be no shortcut to careful judgement.

  • The subjective in the objective

    An objective decision is one that is independent of the decision-maker, as long as that person knows what they are doing.

    A subjective decision is one that is dependent on the decision maker.

    In my experience, engineers (and possibly other humans too) tend to love an objective decision-making process. Objectivity seems to remove fallibility.

    An objective-sounding way of making a decision is to carry out a multi-criteria analysis, in which the different factors are objectively assessed and then the different factors are given a weighting. The best answer then drops out of the process.

    But even if the assessment of different factors is objective, the establishing of the weighting is subjective. Our objective process has become subjective.

    That is fine, as long as we have the skills for making a subjective decision. Subjective decisions take time, require the application of judgement, draw on experience and values. These are factors that are not easily short cut.

  • The wrong (moment to put on your waterproof) trousers

    This is a post for the cycling decision-makers among you. It may resonate even if you don’t cycle. Variations on the question of whether, if it starts raining when cycling, it is worth stopping to put on your waterproofs.

    How late am I running? Have I got time to stop? How heavy is the rain? Will it carry on? How quickly could my clothes dry? Will I get wetter stopping to put them on?

    If I do decide to carry on, is it wetter to go quicker or slower?

    Do I have all the facts? Do I know all the unknowns? Is this a complicated or a complex problem? Am I able to make a good decision? 

    Is there an angle I can cycle at in which my rain shadow protects my lower half sufficiently? 

    Is how I’m framing the question limiting the result? What opportunities am I not considering? If I stop at a random location to put on my waterproofs, what might I notice that I might never have discovered had I ploughed on?

    What happened last time? Was it the right decision? What are other people doing? What would my future self advise?

    Am I even in the right frame of mind to make this decision? What could I be thinking about instead?

    What happens if I get it wrong? How much does it matter to me if I get it right? Am I deluding myself that I’m in control?